From Arthur Motta, June 16, 2025
The recent passing last weekend of Digby Macdonald has moved me to write a short
recollection of him. Digby was brilliant; he could dazzle you with it and leave you
wanting more. I first met him when I was hired at Penn State in 1992. Digby had just
moved to Penn State MatSE from SRI International the year before. Because we had a
common interest in material for nuclear power, we decided to meet to see if we could
collaborate. I went to his office in Steidle Bldg and we talked a couple hours about
corrosion, stress corrosion cracking and what proposals to write for the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. At the end of that time, he took out a yellow pad and started to
write a proposal in perfect cursive, with hardly any words crossed out for 4-5 pages,
without stopping. When he put his pen down, we had a fully written proposal. I was
amazed and a little afraid “is that what every Penn State professor can do? If so, can I
even measure up??...”. The fact we did not get funded that time is almost incidental.
I do recall another occasion in which he impressed in a different way. In August 1995 we
were both in Breckenridge Colorado, for a conference on Corrosion. The organizers put
together a Quick Draw Contest for the participants, as if we were gunfighters in the Old
West. Digby would be a very unlikely candidate to get a quick draw – he was pretty far
from the most athletic person you could ever imagine- but… damned if he did not win
the whole contest (!) Of all the attendees he had the quickest draw of a gun from his
waist..
Digby became one of my mentors, we co-advised my first grad student and we
eventually taught a course together, NucE/MatSE523 “Environmental Degradation of
Materials in Nuclear Power Plants”. Of the course it could have been said that it was
“East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet”: Digby talked about
electrochemistry and corrosion potential, and I talked about radiation damage, and
material microstructure. However, I do recall vividly the impression he made on me in
one of his lectures. He talked for one whole hour, without notes or interruption, about
water and its properties, and it was completely fascinating, although for the life of me I
could not tell you now what he specifically said. The only comparison I can make is
when I was listening to Richard Feynman talk, saying yes, yes, and after the talk I could
not remember what he actually said…
Digby was certainly not Feynman, and had his blind spots which he was completely
unable to notice, but this could have been his strength: he was always optimistic and
convinced he was going to a better place in science, as in life. I do hope this is where
he now is.
Arthur Motta, June 16, 2025